Sunday, February 23, 2014

Nooksack River Blocking Landslide Notes and Pictures

As a follow up on Friday's post (nooksack-river-temporarily-blocked) I did get out to the newest Clay Bank Landslide downstream of Deming yesterday afternoon. One of those chances to get out and learn a few lessons. Dave Tucker got out there as well and got a different view angle than what I have and has some images from above the slide area on the south side of the river nwgeology.2014/02/22/landslide-diverts-nooksack-river-near-deming-washington/.
 
I will add there is some interest in this event as it is not a common thing to have the flow in a river shut off even for a short while. On the good news side, the river riparian area is wide enough that though the slide temporarily blocked flow and diverted the river, the blockage and diversion did not threaten any homes or infrastructure.
 
First a little background as to location and river dynamics.
 
Aerial view (USGS, 2009)
River is flowing from the right to the left (east to west)

Topographic Map (USGS)
The slope where the landslide took place is marked and is approximately 120 feet high

The Nooksack River Reach between Deming and the highway bridge has been and is rather dynamic with significant channel migration. The dynamic nature of the river continues further to the west as well. During big floods in 1990 on this river reach, the river channel shifted as much as 1,000 feet near Deming in a single flood event and the river took out the State Highway bridge.

But even without major floods the Nooksack near the Clay Banks where the slide took place has done a lot of shifting over the past 15 years. That channel migration is illustrated with the following Google Earth images.

1998 with future landslide marked and channel marked with green line (click on picture to enlarge and better see the line)
 
In 1998 the river was hard up against a rock rip rap levee on the north side of the river. That rock lined levee prevented the river channel from migrating northward and turned the river back to the south towards the Clay Banks west of the most recent landslide. The levee was constructed in the mid 1990s. By 1998 landslides had begun on the Clay Banks as the river was flowing hard against the base of the slope at that time. 

2005
 
By 2005 the river channel in the vicinity had shifted significantly and was no longer flowing along the levee to the north. Note the wide swath of trees that had been located between the future landslide site and the river in 1998 had been nearly all removed.

2006

Even in one year between 2005 and 2006 the river had shifted and significant land sliding had taken place at the Clay Banks and was beginning to threaten a home that had originally been located 300 feet from the edge of the slope.

2011

By 2011 the river channel shifts are such that the river is flowing at a right angle into the location of the future landslide. By this time the area of landslides to the west was beginning to become vegetated with red alder, but alas the home had fallen down onto the slope.

Oblique aerial view of landslide area (2009)

At the time of the oblique image the lower part of the slope was clearly being eroded and was steep, but the upper slope was still tree covered. The older landslides were still recently active downstream.

Images and notes from my February 22, 2014 visit.

View of the Clay Banks from the northeast

Older slide area with home collapsed onto the slide


Most recent slide area and river blocking slide
Note large blocks of clay on landslide deposit

Very narrow new channel in front of landslide deposit.
 
I estimated the channel as being 50 feet wide. In contrast to the width elsewhere I took this picture of the river upstream of the site.
 
Much wider river channel upstream

There is a bit of a pool of slow water above the constriction caused by the landslide deposit.

The above image also shows some of the geologic structure relevant to the landslides. The slide that blocked the river came from the upper bluff. This upper bluff section is glacial drift. A sand layer is below the glacial drift and seeps of water can be seen flowing across the lower bluff. The lower bluff is also glacial drift. Easterbrook (1960s) has interpreted these units from top to bottom as Bellingham glacial marine drift, Deming sand and Kulshan glacial marine drift. I've never been able to take a really good look at these units at this location. Given the much improved exposures it may be a worthwhile exploration for interpreting the late glacial history of the area.

Large blocks of clay from the slope failure

Note this block of clay is on my side of the river across from the landslide

I made a few notes of where blocks of glacial drift were located across the river from the main landslide deposit. The furthest I observed were 150 feet from the new main channel.

Closer view of glacial marine drift block

Classic pebble of diorite pebble embedded within the clay matrix
The clay was soft indicative but not entirely definitive of glacial marine drift versus till as till is more typically hard due to compaction by ice.

The most distal clay blocks I observed

One noteworthy feature was the broad swath of wood deposited upstream of the slide area. Perhaps not unusual along the river, but I saw no similar swaths of wood in any of the aerial images including the high resolution oblique images of the river (see aerials above). What I suspect is that as the water backed up across the riparian area immediately after the flow was temporarily blocked and wood over a relative large area was floated and then grounded as the water began to surge across the wide shallow area to the north of the slide blockage. There were indications of very recent sheet flow across all the area downstream of the wood covered area.
Swath of wood accumulated along the head of the overflow path above the slide blockage 
 
Bent over grasses with cobble deposition over the grass in upper left.
Water would have flowed over a broad swath as a sheet prior to the new channel being cut downward just beyond the main landslide deposition area


More of the sheet flow area and a pre existing small side channel
There is a deer standing in the water in the center of the image.
 
The deer had come running out of the woods and down the side channel straight toward me. Something was back in the woods it was keen on getting away from.
 

4 comments:

susan said...

This is a terrific on-the-spot account.--the narrative of a river. With historic photos, too. Wonderful. Thank you for posting it.

So, was the rock rip rap a mainspring of unintended consequences?

Geoffrey Middaugh said...

Outstanding summary. Better than being there. When you say: "I made a few notes of where blocks of glacial drift were located across the river from the main landslide deposit. The furthest I observed were 150 feet from the new main channel." Do you mean, that this drift was moved by the slide, this distance? Or was this historic from the earlier slides? If so, that slide had some force behind it from the top of the bluff? I also anticipated a higher flow to move this much volume out of the blockage. I love this!

Dan McShane said...

Susan: The levee likely enhanced the erosion and slides downstream from this new slide site, but this particular slide did not appear directly related beyond the levee is preventing any northward channel migration. Northward channel migration would take out homes and farm land and, if left entirely unchecked would take out the highway. Where to set a levee is a policy issue I will leave for another day.

Geoff: The way I interpreted the blocks is that they came from the slide itself and were probably a few outliers that rolled to where the area. Its a good size slide and entirely filled the old channel with an addition 10 to feet on top of that. The river sheet flowed over a wide area but just where the slide was thin and outside of the where the slide filled the old channel the river cut downward making a very narrow and deep channel that I suspect will widen with time.

Nancy Nelson said...

Dan,

Thank you so much for sharing this. I am a very very amateur geologist and natural history buff and love this kind of real-life science info.

Nancy