Sunday, January 15, 2023
Sea Level Rise: Notes on the December 27, 2022 Tide Flood
Friday, December 23, 2022
Notes on Sweet and others (2022) Seal Level Rise
Earlier this year Sweet and others(2022) updated Sweet and others (2017): Global and Regional Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the United State. Sweet and others (2017) suggested global sea level (GMSL) will rise as between 0.3 meters and 2.5 meters by 2100. Sweet and others (2022) find the high end of 2.5 m by 2100 less plausible. The bad news is that the rate of GMSL rise has been increasing and Sweet and others (2022) project that the rise in GMSL over the next 30 years will be as much as that over the past 100 years. The 2022 report notes a high level in confidence for their sea level rise scenarios over the next 30 years. Post 30 years the confidence level for sea levels is lower primarily because of uncertainty regarding some of the ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica.
GMSL is not simple and the sea level rise is not uniform around the planet. Some places will see greater sea level rise and others less. The 2017 report included an image of global sea level rise from 1992 to 2016 derived from satellite data measurements.
Figure from Sweet and others (2017)
Global sea level has rises in an uneven manner due to currents, warm water expansion, and changes to gravity fields from more water in the oceans (the Earth's surface is flexible). The sea level also can vary due to cyclical climate patterns that move the ocean water around via wind and temperature patterns. I like to think that the ocean layer as having weather only slower and a bit less pronounced than the atmosphere. The image above also shows that on the Washington State coast the global sea level trend was near neutral for the 1992-2016 time period.For Washington State the 1993 to 2006 period the regional sea level rise was mostly neutral, but the more recent period of 2007 to 2020 shows that regional sea level on the Washington coast has increased as has the regional rates in most places around North America.
Thursday, November 25, 2021
Atmospheric Rivers reads and notes
Since northwest Washington State (and more so southwest British Columbia) are experiencing a series of atmospheric rivers (AR), I have been doing a bit of reading/catching up on the subject. On a professional level ARs paly a role in my work assessing geology risk so understanding ARs is important in assessing geology hazards.
ARs have and continue to receive a lot of attention as they are the cause of much of the large flooding events of the west coastal watershed of North America and are also the source of much of the water in watersheds of the southern portions of the west coastal area. Due to the risk of large floods and the impact to reservoirs, there has and will likely be a continued interest in evaluation and understanding ARs. The most recent flooding in southwest BC and northwest Washington emphasized the importance of this issue. Further, ARs are expected to change with global warming -- there are numerous papers of modeling and climate simulations that indicate changes in ARs over past and present day.
What follows are a few papers with my own notes and what I thought to be pertinent quotes from the papers themselves.
Neiman and others (2011) focus on ARs impacts on 4 different western Washington watersheds, the Sauk, Green, Satsop and Queets. They identify some key attributes to ARs that produce floods.
"ARs were responsible for all floods in these basins during the 30-yr period, even though not all ARs during that period generated flooding. Those ARs that produced flooding typically exhibited two or more of the following attributes: (i) the AR was optimally oriented for orographic precipitation enhancement in a given basin, (ii) the low-level onshore water vapor fluxes into the basin were quite strong, (iii) the AR stalled over the basin, (iv) the melting level was especially high, and/or (v) basin soils were already saturated prior to AR landfall."
The recent AR flooding in northwest Washington and southwest BC had essentially all of the above attributes.
A figure from Neiman and others (2011) illustrates the attributions for the basins they evaluated.
Conceptual representation of key atmospheric conditions associated with the top 10 annual peak daily flows observed in four watersheds in western Washington. (a) Offshore composite IWV analysis (cm; green shading >2.8 cm) based on the NARR for the Queets and Green Rivers. Washington State is shaded and labeled. (b) Overland composite low-level wind-flow direction (blue arrows) based on the NARR for the Green and Queets Rivers. See Fig. 3 for details on the base map. (c),(d) As in panels (a) and (b), except for the Sauk and Satsop Rivers and red arrows. (e) Composite NARR-based vertical profile information common to all four watersheds in the low-level onshore flow (bold arrow). The upper and lower horizontal dashed lines mark the observed and climatological melting levels, respectively (the climatological melting level is from Minder 2010). Gray shading represents the layer of weak moist static stability. The black curve depicts the water vapor flux profile.
Baek and Lora (2021) suggest that ARs intensity may increase sooner rather than later relative to other published papers. If their assessment holds true, changes to ARs will come sooner than most other modeling papers suggests:
"Here we use a series of coupled model experiments to show that there was little to no change in mean AR characteristics in 1920–2005 due to opposite but equal influences from industrial aerosols, which weaken ARs, and greenhouse gases (GHGs), which strengthen them. Despite little historical change, the simulations project steep intensification of ARs in the coming decades, including mean AR-driven precipitation increases of up to ~20 mm per month, as the influence of GHGs greatly outpaces that of industrial aerosols."
Espinoza and others (2018) suggest that ARs will not be as frequent in the future, but may be much more impactful:
"The projections indicate that while there will be ~10% fewer ARs in the future, the ARs will be ~25% longer, ~25% wider, and exhibit stronger integrated water vapor transports (IVTs) under RCP8.5.
Further works on field experiments, process studies, and model evaluation and improvement (e.g., Guan & Waliser, 2017; Hagos et al., 2015; Payne & Magnusdottir, 2015; Ralph et al., 2016; Wick et al., 2013) need to be undertaken to improve the model fidelity and reduce the uncertainty in the projections."
Gershunov and others (2017) consider the increased trend in AR to have already begun and project the increase trend will continue. They also note that the trend will not be uniform along the west coast:
"Moreover, a long-term trend expressed broadly in stronger winter AR activity over the U.S. and Canadian west coast (weaker over Mexico) is associated with long-term warming of the western tropical Pacific; the latter SST trend has previously been identified in multiple observational data sets and explained by anthropogenic forcing [Wang et al., 2015]. Long-term precipitation changes over western North America have been very consistent with this trend. This broad increase in AR activity is corroborated by total seasonal IVT version of the analysis, where it is clearly associated with basin-scale ocean surface warming, as well as by a consistent increasing trend pattern in observed precipitation. These results suggest that the increase in IVT projected for the midlatitudes in response to global warming [Lavers et al., 2015] has been ongoing over at least the north Pacific, which calls for an investigation of the role of ARs in the projected enhancement of extreme precipitation over California and the Western U.S. [Polade et al., 2014] as well as a fresh investigation into observed changes already under way."
Rhodes and others (2020) project that the changes in total precipitation in the west of North America will be primarily the result of ARs
"Changes in precipitation totals are due to a significant increase in AR (+260%) rather than non-AR (+7%) precipitation, largely through increases in the most intense category of AR events and a decrease in the interval between landfalling ARs."
Gershunov and others (2019) also project changes in precipitation specific the watersheds on the west coast. For the the Chehalis River:
"In fact, AR contributions increase in all precipitation bins, with the increases becoming greater at higher intensities, while non-AR precipitation contribution is projected to become more frequent in the drizzle and other low-intensity precipitation categories, and decreasing at higher intensities."
Dongyue and others (2019) did a broad overview of rain-on-snow, a possible contributor to AR flood events (see Neiman and others, 2011 above). Their assessment was not specific to ARs and covered all areas of the US subject to rain-on-snow. Cliff Mass cited this paper in a blog post suggesting that snow melt is a minor contributor to recent flooding after comments suggested snow melt was an additive factor to the recent flooding. However, despite that reference, Dongyue and others (2019) note:
"It is also clear that a significant portion of floods that occur in basins that drain the west facing slopes of the Cascades and the Sierra Nevada are ROS related."
I do agree that for the recent AR event (November 14-15) rain was the source of the majority of the water in the floods, but even a relative minor snow melt component, say 10 percent, can push a river to a much more consequential flood event.
Dongyue and others (2019) further note:
"Historically, the contribution of ROS to extreme runoff in the western United States has been greatest in midelevation areas (1,000 to 1,500 m); this “significant influence zone” will shift higher in the future (above 2,000 m).
This elevation range matches many but not all Cascade watersheds.
The recent AR event in northwest Washington and southwest BC is a preview of what society should plan and prepare for as ARs become more intense with global warming.
Monday, November 15, 2021
Notes on Skagit and Nooksack Flood Levels
An atmospheric river has been aimed at northwest Washington over the past few days and the rain continues today. A look at river level gages and predictions indicates some serious river flooding. But note too that many small streams have no flow gauges or predicted flood crests will flood as well.
The Skagit River has reached flood stage , but the current predicted flood crest at Mount Vernon will not arrive until tomorrow. The Skagit is a large river watershed and the peak flows take a while to get down to the delta area. Projections are for record flood levels at Mount Vernon.
The much smaller Samish River also flows out onto the Skagit delta will peak faster with a record peak today.
Friday, July 9, 2021
Notes on Heatwave Global Warming Attribution
Phillips and others (2021) have taken a rapid assessment run at global warming attribution of the 2021 Pacific Northwest heat event. A summary of key points is provided at the beginning of the paper. Two points stand out:
The observed temperatures were so extreme that they lie far outside the range of historically observed temperatures. This makes it hard to quantify with confidence how rare the event was. In the most realistic statistical analysis the event is estimated to be about a 1 in 1000 year event in today’s climate.
This simply emphasizes what most long-term Pacific Northwest residences felt - this event was very far from what anyone expects for northwest summers. For those that experienced the event, you have a story to tell. But this was more than a remarkable event for the Pacific Northwest; Christopher Burt author of Extreme Weather stated “This is the most anomalous regional extreme heat event to occur anywhere on Earth since temperature records began. Nothing can compare.” So for those that went through the event (I missed it), you can say you went through a world historic weather event.
There are two possible sources of this extreme jump in peak temperatures. The first is that this is a very low probability event, even in the current climate which already includes about 1.2°C of global warming -- the statistical equivalent of really bad luck, albeit aggravated by climate change. The second option is that nonlinear interactions in the climate have substantially increased the probability of such extreme heat, much beyond the gradual increase in heat extremes that has been observed up to now. We need to investigate the second possibility further, although we note the climate models do not show it. All numbers below assume that the heatwave was a very low probability event that was not caused by new nonlinearities.
Under the first possible source, that the event was a very low probability event, global warming additive attribution pushes the temperature upward some amount more. Phillips and others (2021) note that the observed annual maximum daily temperatures in the Pacific Northwest trend is approximately 2 times the global temperature trend. So regardless of the event being rare, our heatwave temperatures have been trending upward at a greater rate than the global temperature trend as well as our local temperature trend.
Tuesday, July 6, 2021
A Few Notes and Readings on the Heat Wave
I missed the heat event in Washington as I am out of the area. So I have no direct observations about the event. From afar it was really remarkable to follow this event as it developed. The weather models and projections were alarming and I will say it caused a level of concern for friends and family. I will also add that I have spent a fair bit of time in the Fraser River canyon and it is is painful to think about what has happened in Lytton.
First of all, the weather prediction models were amazing. Models can be useful, but it really is remarkable when the models indicate something that has never happened and is an extremely rare event and the actual event happens as the models indicated.
Phillippe Papin via twitter.com/pppapin/ lays out the antecedent event in the tropics and how the extreme heat would be generated. Note the post was June 23.
There were a few statements made during the run up to and after the event that warrant repeating:
From the National Weather Service Seattle Office as the heat event was about to take place: "As there is no previous occurrence of the event we're experiencing in the local climatological record, it is somewhat disconcerting to have no analogy to work with." --- National Weather Service, Seattle on June 27, 2021.
This statement from Bob Henson and Jeff Masters clarifies what a big deal this heat event is: "Never in the century-plus history of world weather observation have so many all-time heat records fallen by such a large margin than in the past week’s historic heat wave in western North America. The only heat wave that compares is the great Dust Bowl heat wave of July 1936 in the U.S. Midwest and south-central Canada. But even that cannot compare to what happened in the Northwest U.S. and western Canada over the past week.", Bob Henson and Jeff Masters (worlds-most-extreme-heat-wave-in-modern-history)
Jeff Beradelli (Here) -- "To put climate extremes into perspective we measure against the average. The sigma is the standard deviation of a normal distribution of expected values. In this case the heat dome sigma max is 4.4 - that means it's outside of 99.99% of expected values or a 1/10,000+ chance.
Bumbaco, Dello and Bond (2013) describe of how most heat waves develop in the Pacific Northwest and that description is consistent with this latest event. They note "Current research suggests that the frequency and duration of heat waves are expected to increase in much of the United States, and analysis of the heat events reveals that a significant, increasing trend in the frequency of the nighttime events is already occurring in the Pacific Northwest. A heat wave occurred in 2009 that set all-time-record maximum temperatures in many locations and ranked as the second strongest daytime event and the longest nighttime event in the record."
This chart shows that since the 2013 above described paper there have been a number of additional heat evets of 20+ above normal, and this event blew way past what took place in 2009.
The attribution of this event to anthropogenic global warming (AGW) will be analyzed in detail. The attribution of AGW to extreme heat waves has been generally strong (Special Supplement to the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society Vol. 102, No. 1, January 2021).
Saturday, September 5, 2020
Diverse Commutes This Week
Washington State does have a diverse landscapes. That was very evident on two very different morning commutes this past week.
Wednesday, April 22, 2020
Winter Notes From the Skagit Delta and Spring Tulips
Although the day was bit overcast the ground was warmed up enough to cause a distant field of red tulips to appear to levitate.
Sunday, January 19, 2020
Adiabatic Heating and The Bear Who Stole the Chinook
Meteorologists use a term called dry adiabatic lapse rate and moist adiabatic lapse rate and for how temperature will change within an air mass. When an air mass descends it will warm because the pressure is increasing. As an air mass descends it will warm at the dry adiabatic lapse rate which is approximately 5.5 degrees F for every 1,000 feet the air descends.
The strong east winds that reached Bellingham and Skagit County as well as the lower west slopes of the Cascade Range to the south were the result of a high pressure mound of air east of the Cascades with a low pressure off the coast of Washington. The high pressure air flowed towards the low pressure and as it descended it warmed at the dry adiabatic lapse rate. Even if the original air mass pulled over the mountains may have been cold, the increase pressure would cause it to warm substantially. The roughly 7,000-foot drop over the North Cascades Range would produce a warming of the descending air mass of 38.5 degrees F. So an air mass of say 10 degrees F would warm to 48 degrees F, about the temperature spike Bellingham had for a few hours last Wednesday evening.
Technically this is not a Chinook wind per meteorology, but the results are very similar and I would note the term Chinook wind is used more broadly by some and I do not know if the type of wind that descends east from the Cascades has been given a name.
Billy and I experienced our share of Chinook winds and he alerted me to this song by Jack Gladstone, a Blackfoot and former U of W Husky.
Thursday, January 16, 2020
Snow Eater Wind Comes to Northwest Washington
In Bellingham the temperature jumped about 20 degrees in minutes. The temperature spike lasted for a few hours and when the descending winds eased, the temperature returned the low 20s.
A similar effect took place in the Skagit lowlands that I experienced first hand. I had to venture out to pick up Lisa at the train station in Mount Vernon. The wind was very hard from the east; high enough to cause some slipping on the icy roads as the car was pushed about, and formed numerous speed bumps of snow drifts. But on the return the temperature jumped from the low 30s to the mid 50s in less than 5 minutes.
The Blackfeet Indians called these events snow eaters. Indeed much of the snow was eaten away down from its deep layer by the warmish and dry wind before the temperature lowered to the 30s and the slow wet melt that has persisted all day.
Thursday, September 26, 2019
Klickitat River Delta
But note, the lack of wind mills. This section of the gorge is within a designated national scenic area and hence wind energy development is precluded in this area. Large wind farms are located to the east outside of the scenic area.
Thursday, August 8, 2019
The Cascade Range Defeats the Stratus
Monday, February 4, 2019
Western Red Cedar Die Back in Western Skagit County
Kimberly Cauvel wrote a nice article on the die back of western red cedar in western Skagit County here: /warm-dry-summers-taking-toll-on-area-trees-plants.
Western Skagit County is partially within the rain shadow of the Olympic Range and hence a bit drier than some other parts of western Washington. Seabacher (2007) noted western red cedar die back on eastern Vancouver Island is similar dry sites.
Much of the die back I have observed in Western Skagit County has been on glacial marine drift soils near Bayview and and Samish Island (above picture). Many of these trees appear to have had previous stress as many of the trees have dead leads. But many now, such as the tree above, have completely died. The tree pictured above was one of six nearby cedars that have died within the past year or two. Within a quarter mile of this site are dozens more that have died.
Glacial marine drift soils in the area are silt and clay dominated. The silt and clay holds water and perched groundwater develops on these soils such that seasonal wetlands are common. However, the soils will become desiccated in the summer. A slight increase in overall temperature particularly in the spring and summer may be just enough to push the ability of some western red cedars to survive.
Sunday, December 23, 2018
Birch Bay Storm Surge Event Notes
The flooding was in part the result of the initial low pressure system just off the west side of Vancouver Island. The low created pressure itself caused a sea level rise on the order of 1 foot above the astronomical tide levels. The location of the low off Vancouver Island also created winds that pushed water into the Strait of Juan de Fuca and Salish Sea. The local winds further enhanced the storm surge of tide levels. The local winds also were oriented to develop large waves in a bay that is otherwise rather calm.
The closest tide station with continuous measurements is just south of Birch Bay at Cherry Point. The storm surge at Cherry Point during the storm was 2.5 feet; a high surge for the Salish Sea.
The maximum storm surge coincided with the peak astronomical tide. I suspect that that the storm surge at Birch Bay was even higher due to local geometry of the shoreline and wind direction.
By comparison, the last big storm surge event at Cherry Point was in 2006.
The 2006 storm surge event also coincided with a high tide event and reached 12.5 feet. That event had essentially the same storm surge of 2.5 feet, but the astronomical tide level was 0.5 feet higher in 2006 versus 2018.
Birch Bay may have other issues that will drive erosion and flooding along the shore. The road along the bay is located on top of the upper berm of the beach. Sediment deposited on the road is removed and hence the berm remains at the same level. Sediment supply to the beach has also been disrupted by the cutting through the beach to build a marina on the north of the bay and by shoreline arming on the bluffs south of the beach.
Friday, November 23, 2018
Eastern Washington Ice Fog and Riparian Forest on the Columbia
Monday, July 2, 2018
Hole in the Clouds: Von Karman Vortex
Doing some random research on a favorite topic I came across this NASA image:
As a side note I have been fascinated by the South Atlantic island of Tristan da Cunha in part because I once had a map of the world completely covering on my wall and Tristan was right above the table I ate at - a remote island in the ocean demanding attention.
The hole in the clouds I observed is the same phenomenon and has a name - Von Karman vortex. And turns out that what I observed caught the attention of others and made the local news: https://weather.com/science/weather-explainers/news/2018-02-04-southern-california-von-karman-vortex