Right back out in the field after a bit of vacation. My first field visit was a nice mid to upper 30s and rain day in a forest underlain by glacial marine sediments - which meant lots of wet ground.
The forest was full of small birds seeking insects and their path intersected mine. Apparently I was not viewed as a threat as they landed within feet of me, and for a second one alighted on the toe of my boot. They moved about quickly and the light was a bit dim so I did rather poorly with pictures (I could have turned on the flash, but I wanted to enjoy the little birds and feared the flash would scare them off).
I determined this one as a golden-crowned kinglet
This one I think is female ruby-crowned kinglet
This ruby identification is mostly based on seeing one I thought was a male with its small ruby plumage and no black and white stripe. My two bird books suggest ruby-crowned should be off to the south this time of year, so my ID confidence (never real high) that it is a ruby is diminished.
4 comments:
Ruby-crowned are here year round
males hide their crown when not displaying, so this could be male or female.
watching a pair of Rub-crowned males bicker started me birdwatching
I have never understood why the word "drift"? Were the sediments embedded in the "drifting" ice, or were they later deposited as river sediments?
Thanks for the verification Upup.
As for drift, it kind of is a broad brush term to avoid specifics. The sediment in the glacial marine drift likely was falling out of the floating ice - certainly the occasion boulder would suggest that. There is some influence from inputs from glacial melt water rivers as well.
Post a Comment